. What could this mean? Authors and their institutions are advised to coordinate any of their own publicity with the Journals and Editorial press office by e-mail after their paper is accepted for publication. How long do editor decisions take at Science/Nature? Weigh all of your options and look at the merits of the rejection. n/a. This enables most queries to be resolved before proof stage. I've had Nature hold up papers for months and been forced out by a singe powerful reviewer with advice to publish the paper in another highly ranked (but not glamour mag) journal. Referees are chosen for the following reasons: Although Nature's editors themselves judge whether a paper is likely to interest readers outside its own immediate field, referees often give helpful advice, for example if the work described is not as significant as the editors thought or has undersold its significance. No news is good news? If Nature declines to publish a paper and does not suggest resubmission, authors are strongly advised to submit their paper for publication elsewhere. Figures for recent years (original research only) are shown in the table below: Nature does not employ an editorial board of senior scientists, nor is it affiliated to a scientific society or institution, thus its decisions are independent, unbiased by scientific or national prejudices of particular individuals. Allegations of referee bias are seldom persuasive unless substantiated by strong evidence; we presume our referees are acting in good faith unless proved otherwise, and having sought their advice, we feel an obligation to take it seriously. 5 Answers. When a journal displays the decision in process status, it means that the editorial board is in the process of making the final decision about your paper. Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? In addition, most authors are genuinely excited about their work, and usually submit to Nature Neuroscience because they believe that the paper deserves high-profile publication. Editorial processes are described for the following stages: Atsubmission | Aftersubmission | Afteracceptance. [1] Sovereignty entails hierarchy within the state, as well as external autonomy for states. In practice, of course, this is impossible, and editors must instead rely on a few referees representing a cross-section of informed opinion in the field. The titles of forthcoming papers will be listed on the mailing, along with the corresponding authors' contact details, which means authors may receive media enquiries relating to their paper during this embargo period. Languages English Espaol Portugus Research Creative My Account Submit My Manuscript After review, Nature Communications rejected it because of reason X. The paper is accepted for publication without any further changes required from the authors. 2002 In recognition of the time and expertise our reviewers provide toNatures editorial process, we formally acknowledge their contribution to the external peer review of articles published in the journal. Help us improve this article with your feedback. Could you please shed some light on the outcome of your situation? I submitted a MS to a Nature-Branded Journal on 9/10 and today the status changed to "Editor Decision Started". Decisions by editors are routinely made very rapidly after receipt of reports, and Nature offers an advance online publication (AOP) service to an increasing number of manuscripts. I love to write and share science related Stuff Here on my Website. How did it go for you after this? But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. Share. Journals vary in their attitude toward such trade-offs, for example in deciding whether to publish a paper that proposes an important new idea based on data that are less than solid. The handbookis available from R Upskill, a sister brand providing learning programs for various aspects of a researchers work, including writing, submission, publication, and research promotion. If your paper has been under review before this, then it stands a better chance of getting accepted. paper acceptance probability in case of long peer review time for the 1st decision. Obviously, the most difficult situations are those in which the reviewers arrive at nearly or . How to proceed? 1) After submission, the system shows that Manuscript under consideration, which means that it is being evaluated by the editor; 2) If the latest status becomes Editor decision started, it means it has been sent for review (you can also check whether there is reviewer.zip in the file list, if yes, it means it is sent the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in March 1, 2023 - As we approach, on March 14, its 12-year anniversary, now is as good a time as any to reflect on Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") Rule 206 (4)-5 (the "Pay-to-Play Rule . Answered by Editage Insights Can I ask the editor to publish a withdrawn manuscript after acceptance? A final decision of acceptance or rejection of the revised manuscript is made by the editors as soon as they conclude that they have sufficient information at hand for doing so. A decision to send the paper for review can take longer, but usually within a month (in which case the editors send apologies). 2. Peer review comments, cover letter and more. Click to reveal var d=new Date(); yr=d.getFullYear();document.write(yr); Usually they decide in less than a week after the initial submission. This implies that the scope of the work does not meet international standards and capacity in the journal's . availability to assess the manuscript within the requested time. Need help with your experiments? While editing corrects the structure of your article whereas a peer reviewer gives you an extensive analysis. ensure that the terminology and notation conform to. Natures editors are unable to assign high priority to consideration of appeals. If authors wish to contest an editorial decision, we ask them to submit a form that organizes their arguments into categories that we find useful in reviewing our original judgments. For those who have contemplated pleading for that precious second chance, we simply don't know where to start. Create an account to follow your favorite communities and start taking part in conversations. [2] In any state, sovereignty is assigned to the person, body, or institution that has the ultimate authority over other people in order to establish a law or change . Press J to jump to the feed. The above box-and-whisker plots show the days to decision for manuscripts submitted . Table 11 sketches the different situations the editor may encounter and the decision s/he usually makes in each of these situations. The first stage for a newly submitted Article is that the editorial staff consider whether to send it for peer-review. [CDATA[> To obtain on 07 Apr, 2021, This content belongs to the Journal submission & peer review Stage. 1) After submission, the system shows that Manuscript under consideration, which means that it is being evaluated by the editor; 2) If the latest status becomes Editor decision started, it means it has been sent for review (you can also check whether there is reviewer.zip in the file list, if yes, it means it is sent . For more information,please refer to our FAQ page. Got lab stories? v. t. e. Sovereignty generally refers to the supreme authority of a state or territory. If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience . Will contact my PI if it doesn't change to "decision sent to author" in the next few days. . All manuscripts are handled electronically throughout the consideration process. Manuscript submitted exactly 2 months ago. //--> Internet Explorer). The average number of days between the date of manuscript submission and date of receiving the editorial acceptance decision. After going through the reviewers comments, the editor will make a decision about your manuscript. Instructions for ordering reprints are provided after the paper is scheduled for publication. Sometimes they are more busy. This, in turn, means that the status Awaiting decision refers to the decision that the editor will take about whether your paper will be sent for peer review or desk rejected. The Senior Editor then assesses the manuscript for its quality and perceived level of advance and then either recommends a reject decision or assigns peer reviewers. Hopefully, the exact situation will become clear with the next status update. To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. I submitted a manuscript to a Nature journal six days ago. Will contact my PI if it doesn't change to "decision sent to author" in the next few days. Manuscripts should be submitted via our online manuscript submission system. Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. AE stands for Associate Editor. [CDATA[// >