The Alexandrian Christology is usually referred to as Christology from above, orLogos SarxChristology. In Nestorius letter to Cyril, he argues that Cyril was right to teach the two natures were united in one person, and right to say that the divinity cannot suffer in itself, but that when he goes on to speak of the deity participating in suffering he undoes all his good work. 0000000940 00000 n
Este es a la vez poderoso y frgil, majestuoso y humilde. Alexandrian and Antiochian approaches to hermeneutics as Conceiving Orthodox Christology, reviewing Cyril - pillar of faith'- Miaphysite Soteriology, in light of recent theological research, by Kasper, McGuckin, Meunier, Schoonenberg, Wickham, et al, Dogma and spirituality in Cyrillian logic. One of his favorite phrases is: The Logos suffered impassibly. WebThe Antiochenes looked at Scripture for moral improvement; the Alexandrians sought theosis through contemplative reading. and Antiochene christology [12] This is the only commentary of Origens to have survived from beginning to end, even though it has been significantly truncated in the Latin translation of Rufinus of Aquileia (only a few scattered fragments of the original Greek still exist). Then, there were many different viewpoints of the doctrine proposed by Alexandrian School (ex: Arius, Athansius, and Apollinarius) and Antiochene School (ex: WebThe Alexandrian and Antiochian Christological Thoughts1 Many scholars attribute the problem of the Christological formula concerning the nature of Christ "Mia-physis and Dyophyses" to the controversy between the Alexandrian and the Antiochian theology. 185-254) was born in the Egyptian city of Alexandria to Christian parents. The difference between Alexandria and Antioch was not exegetical; it was theological. 0000004287 00000 n
Jesucristo era plenamente humano y plenamente divino. Hovorun, Serhiy. tuition and home schooling, secondary and senior secondary level, i.e. According to Edwards, the most that can be inferred from Origens extant writings is that the human soul is created in the hand of God immediately before embodiment, but this does not entail any supposed punitive fall from heaven, as Platonists contend. 215 AD) was committed to the idea that all truth, whether in pagan or biblical sources, found its fulfillment in the reality of Christ. Alexandria En sus cartas contra Nestorio, Cirilo no slo defiende el ttulo de Theotokos contra acusaciones de que estaba reviviendo la hereja del Apolinarianismo, pero l niega la genuina legitimidad del uso de esquemas cristolgicos alternativos, tales como la asociacin de personas, de la que haban hablado los pensadores antioqueos. MIRABILIA 17, Home Eletronic Journal of Antiquity & Middle Ages Journal of the Institut d' Estudis Medievals (UAB), Journal of Early Christian Studies 17.3 (2009): 381-419, Vigiliae Christianae 65.4 (2011): 376-407. [7], Such was the heritage of Origens forbears. (LogOut/ El historiador contemporneo Scrates Scholasticus calific a Nestorio de hombre orgulloso e ignorante, cuyo innato e indiscutible poder de oratoria ocult una debilidad de pensamiento incisivo. Cyril plunges into the debate with sharp invective, addressing one document To Nestorius, the new Judas. In Cyrils letters against to Nestorius, Cyril not only defends the title Theotokos against accusations that it was reviving the heresy of Apollinariusm, but he denies the very legitimacy of using alternative Christological schemes a such as the association of personas the Antiochian thinkers had spoken of. For Nestorius, the language of the exchange of properties was generally suspect, and often odious. have discontinued my MBA as I got a sudden job opportunity after [20] In this respect, one sees a clear overlap with the content of Mosaic Law, and especially the Ten Commandments. Christology WebANTIOCH, SCHOOL OF The common doctrinal tendencies, particularly in exegesis and Christology, that characterized the theological thinkers and writers who represented the Antiochian tradition. In these works, Origen describes a threefold distinction in the meanings of Scripture, which correspond to body, soul, and spirit. Early Church Battle Royale: Alexandria vs. Antioch But, our concern was whether she could join the universities of our preference in abroad. Jesus Christ was both fully human and fully divine. For Ariu s Christ was a creature, generated 0000008102 00000 n
helped me to continue my class without quitting job. M. F. Wiles and E. J. Yarnold (Peeters: Leuven, 2001), 306. The Christology of the Fourth Letter of Pseudo-Dionysius Areopagite: Chalcedonian or Monophysite? These are the somatic, the psychic, and the pneumatic senses. For instance, Wai-Shing Chau writes that Origen was operating on a Middle-platonic scheme, as is evident in his notions concerning the Father as the supreme mind, the existence of intermediaries between mind and the material world, and the pre-existence of the soul. WebAlexandria as they had his teacher Origen, but Arius almost single-handedly ushered in an era in which the church was well-nigh intoxicated with Christology, though he did so from a Trinitarian perspective and did not waste much time on the articulation between Christs disparate natures. [13] It is also Christianitys oldest surviving commentary on Romans, predating by about 150 years the second oldest commentary, written by John Chrysostom. This makes Origen unique among early Christian interpreters in ascribing such a pedagogical significance to the fall of Jerusalem. One important distinction is that between Mosaic Law and natural law. From Monophysitism to Nestorianism - Cambridge Scholars WebThe theology of the Alexandrian school was influenced by the Platonic traditions of Philosophy. In fact, Philo goes so far as to say that Greek philosophers must have appropriated their thought from Moses himself. The New Testament describes the early controversy over the question of whether to circumcise Gentile believers (Acts 15). Alexandria and Antioch had developed very different views on the matter: The Alexandrian school leaned towards Christs humanity and divinity being absorbed into each other while Antioch leaned towards maintaining the human and divine in Christ as two separate beings. WebCyril of Alexandria was not only one of the finest Christian theologians of his day, he also stands out in the ranks of the greatest patristic writers of all generations as perhaps the most powerful exponent of Christology the church has known. [17] All of these laws, however, were in some sense an expression of Gods unchanging moral will. 1 (2008), 95-110, The Lynching of Nestorius: Cyril, The Strongman of Alexandria, Created or uncreated: The influence of philosophy and cultural normatives on the development of opposing interpretations of Christ as Logos leading up to Nicaea, The Christology of Eutyches at the Council of Constantinople 448. 0000001216 00000 n
This is why Origen can speak of Christian baptism as the spiritual equivalent of circumcision (Calvinists were not the first to make this connection!). [13] Origen, Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans, Books 1-5, trans. Cirilo insiste en que, si bien por s misma la propia naturaleza humana no es poderosa, sino pasible, en su unin con la divinidad, como en el dinmico acto de la Encarnacin, la naturaleza humana del Logos se convierte as en un instrumento del poder omnipotente, y, por tanto en un sentido real, aunque mentalmente paradjico, en un instrumento omnipotente. Edwards also questions the common assumption that Origen held to a doctrine of the pre-existence of the soul. Alexandria had it's own form of Christology, that defined the Human Nature in the Hypostatic Union to be a generic human nature, and this was in contrast (although not incompatible) with the Antiochene Christology that define's Christ's Human nature as a specific human being. This article questions the value of the categories the school of Antioch and Antiochene christology on the basis of the significant theological differences between the two central figures in the school: John Chrysostom and Theodore of Mopsuestia, both of whom studied together at the school of Diodore of Tarsus in the late fourth century. Note: this paper was previously written for a class on the History of Biblical Interpretation at Westminster Theological Seminary in Philadelphia. Antiochene ", Popular Controversies in World History: Investigating History's Intriguing Questions, Anglican Theological Review 94:3 (Summer), De Medio Aevo 2 (2012 / 2) ISSN-e 2255-5889. These traditions were distinguished, not so much by neatly distinct exegetical practices (as a previous generation of scholars had thought), as by differing conceptions of history, and by the respective influences of contemporary philosophical and rhetorical schools. For him, God the Logos raised the dead Lazarus, while the man Jesus wept at the tomb. Part 1can be readhere. The Letter and the Spirit: A History of Interpretation from Origen to Luther (New York: Peter Lang, 1995), 16. Although Philo was Jewish, his impact would prove to be far greater on later Christian interpreters, such as Clement. [14] Origen was persuaded that all rational creatures, excepting young children,[15] were accountable to some law or another. Origens chief target was Marcion (ca. ALEXANDRIAN (LogOut/ WebCompatibility of Antiochene and Alexandrian Christology - Read online for free. I was in search of an online course; Perfect e Learn Christology St. Vladimirs Theological Quarterly 52, no. Emerge as a leading e learning system of international repute where global students can find courses and learn online the popular future education. 0000001508 00000 n
Finally, I will conclude by arguing that the Reformed traditions approach to Mosaic Law contains both Alexandrian and Antiochene elements. In spite of some of his more idiosyncratic conclusions, Origen developed an exegetical method that would have a profound impact on subsequent theologians. 120-146], The Mystery of the Impossible Union of Divinity and Humanity in Jesus Christ, "The Bishop of Rome and the Ecumenical Council of Chalcedon, AD 451: Why Pope Leo Is Doctrinal and Disciplinary Demands were Met," MA Thesis (2011), Duo filii and the homo assumptus in the Christology of Theodore of Mopsuestia: The Greek fragments of the Commentary on John., Is There Room for Two? Alexandrians vs. Antiochenes on Mosaic By answering that question in the negative, the church acknowledged some degree of discontinuity with Mosaic Law. Origen (ca. Antiochene side. This Demiurge was not inherently evil, but was nevertheless inferior to the God of love and compassion revealed by Jesus. Nestorio sostuvo que el trmino Theotokos no hizo justicia al hecho de que, en sentido Eirini ARTEMI, The rejection of the term Theotokos by Nestorius of Constantinople and the refutation of his teaching by Cyril of Alexandria De Medio Aevo 2 (2012 / 2) ISSN-e 2255-5889 126 estricto, Mara no fue la madre de Dios, sino la madre del hombre a quien la fe cristiana reconoce como divino, y por eso lo llama Dios. develop their business skills and accelerate their career program. Philo, a wealthy first-century Jew, was well known for his efforts to integrate Greek philosophy and Jewish theology. 16 and 33, Vetus Latina: Aus der Geschichte der lateinischen Bibel (Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany: Herder, 1990-1998). [24] Without a temple, there no longer existed the possibility of a priesthood or a sacrificial system. It is at once powerful and fragile, majestic and humble. Developing a conducive digital environment where students can pursue their 10/12 level, degree and post graduate programs from the comfort of their homes even if they are attending a regular course at college/school or working. It was generally in contrast with and sometimes opposed to the theology of Alexandria. Cyril of Alexandria was not only one of the finest Christian theologians of his day, he also stands out in the ranks of the greatest patristic writers of all generations as perhaps the most powerful exponent of Christology the church has known. [1] Donald Fairbairn, Patristic Exegesis and Theology: The Cart and the Horse, Westminster Theological Journal 69 (2007), 10-11; Brevard Childs, The Struggle to Understand Isaiah as Christian Scripture (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2004), 132-33; Frances Young, Alexandrian and Antiochene Exegesis, in History of Biblical Interpretation, ed. 85-160), whose name has become synonymous with an excessively lowview of the Old Testament. WebAlexandrian and Antiochene theologians were expedient hermeneuts, meaning they utilized whichever exegetical practice (allegory, typology, literal, historical) that would supply them with their desired theology or interpretive conclusion. Therefore, Origen understands the contrast between law and gospel not as one of judgment versus mercy, but rather imperfect religion versus perfect religion. Theodore of Mopsuestia prefers to speak of the perfect union of Christs natures rather than synthesis. In their Christology they stressed the divinity of Christ. On the one hand, Jewish interpreters insisted on the total and literal application of Mosaic Law, compelling Christians to defend the supremacy of the revelation of Christ. Thanks to Moses and the ceremonial laws, a certain part of humankind began to be liberated from the kingdom of sin and death, and cleansing of sins began to be ushered in.[26] Origen even goes so far as to say that the Mosaic Law is a life-giving Spirit for those who understand it spiritually.[27] He argues that it is precisely on this point that both Jews and Marcionites fall into error. It is indeed a good and necessary step in the hermeneutical process. WebThe theology of the Alexandrian school was influenced by the Platonic traditions of Philosophy. 845 (2012) 153-177. More often, however, Origen makes use of a merely twofold distinction between the literal sense and the spiritual sense, in accordance with Pauls terminology of letter and spirit (2 Cor. John Anthony McGuckin (Louisville, Ky.: Westminster John Knox Press, 2004), 140-41. Quite the contrary, Origen believes that the letter of the Mosaic Law brought the beginnings of life to humanity. Cyril insists that Mary, the mother of God, should be called Theotokos. l encontr en las expresiones Madre de Dios y Dios sufriente poco ms que una devocin ignorante que haba cortado tantos ngulos en sus implicaciones, hasta el punto de haberse quedado muy cerca de las concepciones mticas paganas de la deidad. This makes it an invaluable resource on early Christian understanding of Mosaic Law. This distinction corresponds in some degree to his distinction between letter and spirit, and it is only the ceremonial law as letter that Origen rejects. 42 0 obj
<<
/Linearized 1
/O 44
/H [ 940 297 ]
/L 26946
/E 10052
/N 4
/T 25988
>>
endobj
xref
42 26
0000000016 00000 n
In large measure, Origen inherited this de-historicizing and allegorizing approach to Scripture from two earlier Alexandrians: Philo and Clement. Theological Controversy in the Seventh Century Concerning Activities and Wills in Christ. Supervised by Andrew Louth, (University of Durham, 2004). 0000009389 00000 n
Para Nestorio, el lenguaje del intercambio de propiedades era en general sospechoso, y con frecuencia odioso. Alexandrian and Antiochian approaches to hermeneutics as Cyril insists that while of itself human nature is not powerful but passible, in its union with the godhead, as in the dynamic act of Incarnation, the human nature of the Logos thereby becomes an instrument of omnipotent power and thus, in a real thought paradoxical sense, an omnipotent instrument. Theological History of Two Natures/One Person, The rejection of the term Theotokos by Nestorius Constantinople, Nestorius did not intend to argue that Christ had a dual nature, but that view became labeled Nestorianism (PRO), The Two Is of Christ: Revisiting the Christological Controversy, El rechazo del trmino Theotokos por Nestorio de Constantinopla y la refutacin de su enseanza por Cirilo de Alejan, La Virgen Mara, Theotokos, y Cristo, verdadero Dios y verdadero Hombre. Dictionary : ANTIOCHENE THEOLOGY He writes: The works which Paul repudiates and frequently criticizes are not the works of righteousness which are commanded in the law, but those in which they boast, who keep the law according to the flesh; that is to say, the circumcision of the flesh, the sacrificial rituals, and the observance of Sabbaths and new moon festivals. Dr. Pittenger's Criticism of the Alexandrine Christology.-In one place Dr. Pittenger admits that the Alexandrine and the Antiochene are two legitimate ways of thinking on the Person of our Lord, and that each of them will have adherents and admirers all the time. Online tuition for regular school students and home schooling children with clear options for high school completion certification from recognized boards is provided with quality content and coaching. THE ALEXANDRIAN AND ANTIOCHENE SCHOOLS Early Church Battle Royale: Alexandria vs. Antioch The goal of this paper will be to evaluate the life and work of one representative of the Alexandrian tradition, Origen of Alexandria. Had a great experience here. Rather than being a prison house, our bodies give us the opportunity to exercise virtue and grow into the likeness of God. [25] Thomas Scheck, Law, in The Westminster Handbook to Origen, ed. Alexandria and Antioch had developed very different views on the matter: The Alexandrian school leaned towards Christs humanity and divinity being absorbed into each other while Antioch leaned towards maintaining the human and divine in Christ as two separate beings. [3] According to Elizabeth Lauro, the somatic sense can be understood as literal, whereas the psychic and pneumatic senses are non-literal. Origen identifies the content of natural law with what is known as the second table of the law, encompassing such prohibitions as murder, adultery, and false testimony. [6] But such truth was often expressed in the form of enigmas, symbols, and allegories. WebANTIOCHENE THEOLOGY The dominant theology of the early Church in Antioch. [7] Piotr Ashwin-Siejkowski, Clement of Alexandria on Trial: The Evidence of Heresy from Photius Bibliotheca (Boston: Brill, 2010), 40-43, 75. WebAlexandria as they had his teacher Origen, but Arius almost single-handedly ushered in an era in which the church was well-nigh intoxicated with Christology, though he did so from a Trinitarian perspective and did not waste much time on the articulation between Christs disparate natures. Philo used this allegorical approach to Scripture to prove that Moses was superior to any pagan philosophers. This article questions the value of the categories the school of Antioch and Antiochene christology on the basis of the significant theological differences between the two central figures in the school: John Chrysostom and Theodore of Mopsuestia, both of whom studied together at the school of Diodore of Tarsus in the late fourth century. For Ariu s Christ was a creature, generated Una de sus frases favoritas es: El Logos sufri impasiblemente. However, it is not the final step.